I thought that Mary Jo Montenegro’s presentation was
excellent and incredibly interesting. I have enjoyed all of the presenters that
we have encountered this week, but Mary Jo was additionally fascinating to me.
One of my close friends teaches in CPS and I was aware that CPS’s ELL student
population was growing, but I had no idea how diverse the actual population is.
I had never even heard of Wolof before today and, as a teacher, I believe I
would feel quite intimidated if I had a student speaking a language I had never
even heard of enter my classroom.
I found the statement that it takes 2-3 years to socially
master a language and 7 years to master it academically to be very interesting.
I think that many of the ELL students that I know are well on their way to
achieving “social mastery,” but far from being able to academically master
English. Of these students, quite a few are content with social mastery and
aren’t striving for anything past that. I wonder, as an educator, what we can
do to further interest in full, academic mastery of English.
I was also surprised that they rely so heavily on DIBELS and
AIMSweb to identify need. Our district has made it a requirement that all
special ed students are tracked through AIMSweb in the junior high and high
schools and while the program provides good data, there are times when we feel
that the information we get (primarily in reading and writing) isn’t relevant
to our high school students’ needs. However, I can see where these tests would
be very applicable for a student working on the truly basic English skills. This
may be something to suggest to our ELL teachers.
I agree with you about the need to help motivate students to continue their language learning to get to the academic mastery level. I think what tends to be missing is an understanding by legislators, test makers, etc that language learning is a process and a long one at that. It's not easily rushed. "They" want results without understanding the process of language learning.
ReplyDelete